This Week in What Some May Call Health
This
Week in What Some
May Call Health
Dr.
Stephen Gangemi * Chapel Hill, NC
November 4, 2009
1)
The Food and Drug
Administration's panel of respiratory device experts recently voted
that
Asthmatx's Alair System be approved under certain conditions, including
long-term safety monitoring of patients. The company's procedure,
called
bronchial thermoplasty, uses extreme heat to burn away lung tissue that
makes
it difficult to breath and causes coughing spasms and wheezing. Asthma
medications were among the top-selling drugs in the U.S. last year. **
I think
the company should change their slogan “It’s about breathing” to “It’s
about
breathing and burning your lung tissue”. More catchy. Most don’t
realize that
asthma is as much, or sometimes more, of an adrenal gland problem as it
is a
lung problem. I’ve written two articles about this subject, here and here.
2)
Today a cat in Iowa was
found to be infected with the swine flu. **The news here is not
that it is
first time the virus has been known to cross over to a dog or cat, but
who the
heck actually goes and gets their pet
tested for H1N1?
3)
No, I’m not against all
vaccines - The malaria vaccine is looking promising. Although it is
only
thought to be 50% effective, it could save 500,000 kids a year, and
hopefully
more as it develops. GlaxoSmithKline has been working on the vaccine
for 20
years and there are still a few more years of trials before it’s
officially
approved, hopefully by 2012. **Think about that. Over a million
people, 80%
children, in Africa die every year from malaria and they still can’t
get the
vaccine out right away. That’s a far cry from the fractions that will
die from
H1N1 and the vaccine is here immediately. Who needs studies anyway?
Every paper and news station says that those under 18 years old and
pregnant women should get the H1N1 vaccine, even though there is no
proof they are safe. So why does the vaccine insert state that it's
only for persons 18 years and older, there have been no controlled
studies demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after
vaccination, and the vaccine may cause fetal harm and only given to
pregnant women if clearly noted (Section 8.1)? Guess we're not supposed
to read that. You can read it here.

